Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Blond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sabrina Blond[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. No independent reliable sourcing. No nontrivial pertinent GNews or GBooks hits. Claimed award is not well-known or significant merely because it was given out at the same trade show, but by a different awardgiver, as a more notable award. PROD removed without substantive justification or nontrivial article improvement. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 00:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Hasn't won any significant awards, no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 03:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom's accurate analysis. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable pornographic actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.