Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabre Norris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sabre Norris[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable references given, or indication of notability. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Her big claim to fame is landing a 540? — Sean Brunnock (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete for lack of notability. Mccapra (talk) 23:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. I have significantly edited the page, adding numerous RSs. Contributors please note that unsupported comments such as "lack of notability", without any supporting reasoning are not helpful to the decision making process here. Relevantly, SPORTCRIT is effectively WP:GNG; and WP:SPORTSPERSON states: A sportsperson is presumed to be notable if the person has won a significant honor and so is likely to have received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject. Meeting this requirement alone does not indicate notability, but it does indicate that there are likely sufficient sources to meet the GNG. A rudimentary Google search produced numerous RSs; and more were easily found using WikiLibrary. Absence of citations is not a reason to delete: it's a reason to improve the page. Please be mindful of WP:ATD. Cabrils (talk) 00:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per a source review, the subject meets WP:BASIC. Also, per WP:NEXIST, notability is not based upon the state of sourcing in articles. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As per WP:HEY, the subject is meeting WP:BASIC.Jeni Wolf (talk) 13:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.