Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabin Vaccine Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sabin Vaccine Institute

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely promotional, this is another paid-for article by blocked user:BiH. Wikipedia cannot be allowed to be used for profit in this way at the abuse of the voluntary unpaid time that dedicated users spend building this encyclopedia which in spite of some biographies and articles about some companies, was never intended to be an additional business networking platform. Whether the text itself sounds promotional or not, the article is an advert. The sources are either dead links or one primary source. Fails WP:ORG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:27, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 16:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete First, let me say that I suspect that with a thorough search it may be possible to verify notability of this organization. However, the opening paragraph is a word-for-word wp:copyvio of [1], so it needs to be deleted, but without prejudice if someone wants to re-create an honest article. LaMona (talk) 16:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:TNT and start better and although I found links here, here, here and here, it's best to start again especially with better information and sourcing. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unfortunately, per inherent problems from the article's start as noted, above. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 16:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While this group may have enough reliable sources online to make a WP:N-compliant article from it, as-is it's more like an almost advert. If someone can recreate it from reliable sources, that's fine for me.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.