Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabeena Karki
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
- Sabeena Karki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod (from a IP-also user keeps on removing the orphan tag) anyway-unotable radio person with unreliable refs. Wgolf (talk) 21:06, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- In oppose to the deletion; The article is a stub, therefore, we should allow other contributors to build on it. It has introduced reference to the third party sources, therefore, we should consider keeping the article active. Salman 06:32, 16 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samsujata (talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: I did not find anything notable here. Educationtemple (talk) 18:20, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:22, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Stub-status aside, I'm finding little or no reliable coverage independent of the subject (sorry, but a Facebook user profile ranking from an apparently anonymous blog hardly qualifies). Levdr1lp / talk 11:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.