Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saara Lamberg (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. One of the delete !votes concerning "likes on facebook" relative to 'seeming notability' is not guideline- or policy-based. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saara Lamberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NACTOR. almost all her acting roles are short appearances or in non notable productions. everything she has produced is "short" and non notable. also no articles really link to her except the Underbelly movie which she appeared in for a few minutes. It's a very low bar if we accept minor actors like this into WP. LibStar (talk) 06:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:57, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:44, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 02:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The same false argument is used here as in the previous discussion, where it has allready been proven not to be true.--Snaevar (talk) 00:08, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 17:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not seem that notable.. only 125 likes on facebook Abrasapuentes (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails actor notabilty.122.171.237.5 (talk) 05:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.