Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saad Mamoun
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Saad Mamoun[edit]
- Saad Mamoun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails wp:bio: "If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability." The external link has 1 passing mention. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-07-05t20:14z 20:14, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A quick Google search of his name turns up several book results. Looks like the article could be expanded.Vnarfhuhwef (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now. Lets see if the article can be expanded any. A two star general is a high rank, there should be information on this person somewhere that can be added. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Has coverage in plenty of books. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:55, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per links revealed above. Not sure myself what the general general notability bar should be, but his command experience during the 1973 conflict seems to have rendered him somewhat notable for his role the sequence of events. BusterD (talk) 15:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.