Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S Sacchidananda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 23:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S Sacchidananda[edit]

S Sacchidananda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable politician who fails to meet the WP:NPOL and WP:GNG Just a candidate representing a National-level political party. -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 16:16, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Wikipedia Editors and Contributors,
I wanted to inform you that we have made significant updates to the article about S Sacchidananda in an effort to address concerns regarding notability. We have carefully reviewed the notability guidelines (WP:NPOL and WP:GNG) and have made revisions to ensure the article better aligns with these standards.
We encourage you to revisit the article and provide your feedback. Your input is highly valuable in helping us improve the quality and verifiability of the content. We are committed to making this article a valuable resource for Wikipedia readers. Blackanu20 (talk) 07:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask why you are referring to yourself as "we"? Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete notability for politicians is for office holders, not candidates. No other notability requirements are met. microbiologyMarcus (petri dishgrowths) 17:06, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I've updated the content. Instead of removing the article, please try to improve it. Blackanu20 (talk) 11:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Still doesn't meet notability standards. If a subject doesn't meet the standard, there is no "improvement" or "update in content" that will change the result to a keep. GPL93 (talk) 12:54, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.