Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SUNIST

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The possibility of a merge is left as an editorial decision. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:14, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SUNIST (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't verify that this is WP:NOTABLE. It could possibly be merged / reidrected to Tsinghua University as an alternative to deletion, if felt worth having as a section, but I was unsure on that one; it is not even mentioned at present in that article. Boleyn (talk) 11:15, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 12:28, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I agree with Jo-Jo. I'm getting 8000+ mentions in GS, so there's significant science done at that place. The main problem here is that finding sources about SUNIST would probably require speaking Chinese. This isn't a clear keep for me, but given that I don't speak Chinese, I would be very unconformable deleting it given the GS results. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:13, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:44, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.