Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ST Andromedae
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ST Andromedae (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although this article was dePRODded as being notable, I still do not believe it meets the notability guidelines. All search results in google scholar turned up only in large lists of objects, and the star obviously fails all the other criteria of WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 02:18, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – If it helps, Bogdanov & Taranova (2012) looks to have some relevant information. Praemonitus (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; it meets WP:NASTRO criteria 2, obviously, as the star is cataloged in the General Catalog of Variable Stars and has been given a variable star designation. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.