Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SRX Team
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- SRX Team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This element of the Super Robot Wars series does not establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, this is just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden. Magioladitis (talk) 21:55, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 22:15, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep, as this is possibly the article at which level that others should be merged up and in to? At the moment it is very short, bordering on empty. But combining the best out of the rest would expand it to cover them suitably. Mathmo Talk 01:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This individual element of the video game series has not any significant coverage by reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. Jappalang (talk) 03:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per notability guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no demonstration of notability outside their work of fiction. Marasmusine (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no significant coverage in reliable third-party sources, and thus this article inherently fails WP:V and WP:N. Randomran (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note Similar elements such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thrudgelmir (Mecha) have been recently deleted. -- Magioladitis (talk) 12:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.