Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQEP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ran full 7 days and no-consensus reached Nja²⁴⁷ 08:46, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SQEP

Google search of SQEP does not yield any result indicating that it stands for "Suitably Qualified and Experienced Person". Mblumber (talk) 02:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - an dic-def with no Notability provided. There are a lot of possibile meanings including Software Quality Evaluation Plan or Soil Quality Evaluation Program as well as the meaning Suitably Qualified and Experienced Person so at best, a Dab should exist here. But I think that the Dic-def trumps any possible Notability this definition may have. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 06:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with Exit2DOS2000, this does not have article potential any more than SWF or LTR. Drawn Some (talk) 14:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't know how Mblumber did his Google search, but the results showing the usage are available.

I just searched "SQEP", and beside the wikipedia article, there were no hits referring to "Suitably Qualified and Experienced Person". I guess what I mean to say is that this might make a better disambiguation page, rather than its current form. --Mblumber (talk) 03:47, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep As stated above, it can be found on a Google search quite easily. Though, I'm not entirely convinced that it needs it's own article, As it seems like a pretty localized and specific acronym; It just sounds like something else you can put on your resume. Renaissancee (talk) 22:14, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Heavily used in the highly-regulated engineering field where I sometimes work as a contractor. Linuxlad (talk) 07:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it is used a lot, does that make this definition Notable? All the mentions of it I found were using the term, not talking about the term. Does it mean that this (is/will be) more than a simple Dic-def. There are a lot of other meanings to this Acronym, so wouldn't it make sense to make it a Dab page here, then interwiki it to Wiktionary for those that are straight up definitions only? Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 12:12, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a dictionary definition. Yes I can find the term being used but that's all. -- Whpq (talk) 17:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.