Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SOPHOS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SOPHOS[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New journal with two published (annual) issues covering (under)graduate research mainly in Philosophy. Article creation seems to be premature, no signs of notability. The article states that the journal is indexed in the Index Copernicus International (a non-selective database where users can enter new journals themselves) and EBSCO (but I cannot find any evidence that this is actually true). Does not appear to meet either WP:Notability (academic journals) or WP:N. Crusio (talk) 10:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 10:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a little too tricky to waste a lot of time on. Evidence given to date does not show sufficient notability per nom. Polargeo (talk) 11:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article was created before the article has had a chance to gain notability. At this point it looks like it does not pass any of the criteria in Wikipedia:Notability (academic journals). —David Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.