Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMV High School, Thiruvananthapuram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

SMV High School, Thiruvananthapuram

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

SMV High School, Thiruvananthapuram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSCHOOL. YogeshWarah^Talk 04:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. YogeshWarah^Talk 04:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. YogeshWarah^Talk 04:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. YogeshWarah^Talk 04:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. First off, the Hindu article is both a reliable source and indicative of significant coverage. Secondly, the school is about 175 years old, pre-dating the 1857 reorganization of British Raj, making it one of the oldest schools in India. It easily passes my standards for schools. Finally, even a brief review of book sources shows it in government reports going back 60 years and is even mentioned in a reputable tour guide! Bearian (talk) 17:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Bilorv (talk) 23:15, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

• Keep: As per the findings by Bearian and this source[1] from the Hindu. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 09:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
• Keep Bebopjohnson (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
• Procedural keep - nomination was by a sock in evasion of a block, bad faith nomination Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.