Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMT Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 12:23, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SMT Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company may be notable, but tone is promotional. It's all about what its selling. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:58, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even if the company is notable I'll say that we should WP:IGNORE ond delete this article for being overly promotional--Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The company was listed on Warsaw Stock Exchange at some point; it shouldn't matter that it isn't now (notability is not temporary). On pl wiki as a rule all companies listed on WSE are notable. Wikipedia:Notability (organizations) (WP:LISTED) suggests that our criteria are more strict, and GNG should be respected - still, it may be possible more sources can be found. My quick search did not find any more reliable sources besides what I've added to the article, and to be honest I am not that interested in rescuing what is indeed a promotional entry. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:38, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn't meet notability requirements. SchreiberBike talk 02:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.