Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIMPLY SOFTWARE NZ LIMITED

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted non-notable advertising --M @th wiz 2020 21:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SIMPLY SOFTWARE NZ LIMITED

This company is "in the final stages of formation" - but it needs to come back when it passes WP:CORP or perhaps WP:WEB. I'm sure Yellowikis will host its page though. Kappa 00:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why should that matter? Wikipedia is available to anyone to create articles at any stage so it can then be built upon. SuperRobot5000 _{(User has 7 edits, all on this article, user page, and Wikipedia Introduction.Tokakeke) 01:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

That does not mean anyone can create an article about anything they want and consider it notable enough to be kept. The article is NPOV and advertising, regardless.Speedy Delete, or Delete Tokakeke 01:27, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Maybe it will be notable after its created, but there's no indication on the page that it's notable now. --Thunk 01:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely non-notable, doesn't come close to passing WP:CORP (it's not even real yet). I find SuperRobot5000's argument completely flawed as that is, simply put, not the standard that wikipedia holds itself to. --Bachrach44 01:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable corporation. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-17 02:15Z
Delete The website isn't even up yet. Anyway, the pagename is wrong. And, as argued above, we dont have proof that this thing exists (no google hits) --Rabid Monkeys Eat Grass 02:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Now I know what happens when two people edit a page at the same time. This company needs to exist, and reflect WP:CORP, or it has no business with it's own Wikipedia article (no pun intended). Captain Jackson 02:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable.--ragesoss 04:06, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as non-notable advertising. Sycthos ^Talk 04:46, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete advert, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP, advert is not a speedy category (sadly), and neither is vanispamcruftisement, which is what this is. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 09:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Pure intentional ad spam. Should have been speedy from the beginning. Admins should not be afraid to speedy stuff like this whenever they see it. —gorgan_almighty 14:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try standing for adminship with that on your platform and see how far you get :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 14:53, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LOL per comment. I think this should have been speedied immediately, saves a lot of time. Tokakeke 20:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this vanispamcruftisement because even Kappa doesn't like it. Besides Yellowikis will host anything. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 17:18, Jan. 17, 2006
Delete as an advertisement for an (as of yet) non-notable company. JIP | Talk 18:34, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Kappa. <sm>Wow, I just typed that!<sm> Barno 20:11, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.