Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SG Suryah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SG Suryah[edit]

SG Suryah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL as a local-level political party official. Either a vanity page or written by his political party, which has been caught using Wikipedia for promotional purposes in the past. GPL93 (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 18:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:POLOUTCOMES; state and local party officials are not automatically notable, and this one seems run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. People are not automatically notable just for being regional organizers with political parties, and this one is not referenced anywhere near well enough to get him over WP:GNG in lieu of actually having to hold a notable political office to pass WP:NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete looks like promotion of not notable politician. Fails WP:NPOL.— Harshil want to talk? 01:27, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.