Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SDD Global Solutions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Those seeking deletion pointed out the lack of reliable sources demonstrating notability. While James500 suggested that there were such sources, none were provided here or in the article. No prejudice against recreation if notability can be established. Chillum 14:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SDD Global Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that they meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Their parent company might, but they don't have an article. Boleyn (talk) 20:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • If their parent company is notable, and they are not, (upon which I make no representation) the correct solution is to move the page to the name of the parent company, and rework the article accordingly. James500 (talk) 13:35, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment James500, I'm not asserting that the parent company is notable, just that there is a possibility it would meet criteria, but SDD definitely doesn't. Boleyn (talk) 15:57, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 Talk 13:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.