Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAFSMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SAFSMS[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:34, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability. Only refs provided are a blog and a brief (one paragraph) summary in a Nigerian paper, on its own insufficient to establish notability. A search turned up no additional significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 15:44, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:15, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Also this is the English Wikipedia, not the acronym one, so title would be spelled out if it were ever to be notable. Maybe some day it might. Article right now does not even give a hint what SAF stands for? W Nowicki (talk) 22:58, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.