Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAE (Producer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SAE (Producer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. No references and conflict of interest. Clubmarx (talk) 05:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. In my opinion the article as it stands almost (but not quite) meets the criteria for a G11 speedy deletion. That aside, I cannot find any sources on the internet that would satisfy the notability guidelines at WP:MUSICBIO, but if someone else finds some I'll change my !vote. By-the-by, a conflict of interest is not by itself grounds for deletion. -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 06:35, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no notability demonstrated in any source, and no sources to support the claims. N2e (talk) 04:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.