The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delmikka(t) 01:21, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable corporate VP. Rmhermen 22:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a good enough case for notability; article reads like a CV fragment. OhNoitsJamieTalk 01:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn resume/stub Ruby 01:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. mikka(t) 01:21, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
