Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S. M. Azhar Alam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:28, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

S. M. Azhar Alam[edit]

S. M. Azhar Alam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG ,WP:PROF and WP:DIRECTOR. Autobiography written by the subject himself lacks third party sources.He is a Lecturer in a college now there are thousands of lecturers in India and there is nothing notable clearly fails WP:PROF on all counts. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. sst 13:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. sst 13:09, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No evidence of passing WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE. (Also not WP:PROF but that seems less appropriate a criterion for someone in performing arts, despite his academic position.) —David Eppstein (talk) 21:18, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Lack of the adequate notability for a living person. I was more successful finding scholarly work of his other namesakes including Muhammad Azhar Alam of University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Arashtitan 15:44, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as apparently not better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.