Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sérgio Lopes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – Joe (talk) 10:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sérgio Lopes[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP without working references Rathfelder (talk) 10:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 10:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 10:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 10:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The pt.wiki text is more complete and does contain some review/interview links (albeit dead and archived links) as well as claims to Gold records, which could be sufficient for WP:MUSICBIO #3. Pró-Música Brasil confirms the subject's O Sétimo was a Gold record. AllyD (talk) 10:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per AllyD, the Portuguese article has better referencing including evidence of Gold records which is a pass of WP:NMUSIC imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:10, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 16:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.