Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryu Sera

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I can't really justify closing as "keep" as only Mast3r has really given a confident decision to do so; however the net effect is the same, so it's not a major issue. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ryu Sera (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources do not assert notability: primary or not relating to her personally. Likely best to revert back to redirect. Dirk Beetstra T C 19:50, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, besides her popular involvement in Nine Muses, Sera has recently renewed activites under a new label. I will provide a list of relevant recent solo activites and a few supporting secondary published sources each:

I could provide more, that's just what to came to mind at this moment. And of course, there are heaps of personal articles from her involvement in Nine Muses, but those are better searched under "nine muses sera".

The article in its current form is outdated, incomplete and under construction, so it shouldn't be used to judge. But I'm glad we can entertain the notability question now, before more effort is expended on it. Mast3r (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Beetstra: Hi, sorry for bothering. But I don't know if you're watching this page and I wanted to ask what you think :) I want to start reworking the article so I'm looking for opinions. Thank you. Mast3r (talk) 12:57, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just rework the article and get it to standard. --Dirk Beetstra T C 17:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Without use of bolded !votes, my reading of this is a fairly balanced short discussion at the moment, so I feel a relist is warranted
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:19, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 07:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discuss the sources provided by Mast3r.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, wumbolo ^^^ 10:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.