Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rye 3d
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OR, created by author Naconkantari e|t||c|m 22:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per nominator; the article has little to no encyclopedic value. joturner 22:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete of course. -Justin (koavf), talk 22:49, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SpeedyStrong delete um, why is this even being AFD'd? It's non-notable original research written from the 1st person perspective by the creator of both the article and the article's subject. What's to discuss? —WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 23:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Comment Alright, I guess it's true that it doesn't quite fit into any speedy category. I will note that the author's only attempt at saving the article was to remove it from the day's list. —WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 17:21, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Impossible to judge it's quality as an article as it fails at even being an article in the first place. I can't quite fit it into any speedy criterion, but it definitely must go. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:19, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Eighth-grader's report on his independent study project is OR, not encyclopedic. Fan1967 23:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOR, obviously. I do agree with Starblind that it doesn't quite meet speedy criteria. PJM 02:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 14:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Never mind; its author removed it from the 3rd's page. —Cryptic (talk) 15:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research. --Terence Ong 15:11, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. --MaNeMeBasat 15:10, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.