Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryder Skye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ryder Skye[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unremarkable adult actress. Significant RS coverage not found. Article cited to interviews, online directories, industry PR materials, personal web site and other unsuitable sources.

Award listed (Best Cumback) is not significant; the rest are nominations. Article delves into trivial and personal details such as the subject's breast augmentation surgery and other similar aspect's of the subject's biography. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:30, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 06:23, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see coverage in RS. Note she is a fairly prolific adult actress - she might merit an entry in the future. In terms of industry coverage - it is there, just almost nothing in mainstream.Icewhiz (talk) 21:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 00:45, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Montanabw^(talk) 05:35, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom's accurate analysis. "Best Cumback" is not a significant award. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 11:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.