Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Fitzgerald (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tom Fitzgerald (ice hockey)#Personal. JohnCD (talk) 11:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Fitzgerald (ice hockey)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 23:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:48, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 15:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He doesn't inherit notability from his father and doesn't seem to meet either GNG or NHOCKEY.Mdtemp (talk) 17:29, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tom Fitzgerald (ice hockey)#Personal as is typically done for non-notable athletes who are children of notable ones. See, for instance, minor league baseball players Tate Matheny, Tyler Nevin, Mariano Rivera III, and Ryan Ripken, all non-notable athletes whose pages redirect to their notable athlete fathers' pages because it's a plausible enough search term to do so. Smartyllama (talk) 17:15, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tom Fitzgerald (ice hockey)#Personal, which does include a discussion about Ryan. Rlendog (talk) 23:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.