Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Brummund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:34, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ruth Brummund[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This astrologer appears to fall short of WP:PEOPLE. bobrayner (talk) 19:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I've been watching this article for a while without any improvements made to it. It's mostly edited by the same person who edits Uranian Astrology a lot, which is in itself a suspect article although it is definitely more worthy of inclusion than this horsesh*t biography.Pascal (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage by independent third party sources. If such sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:36, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Some astrologers are notable; she isn't. I could find no coverage about her. --MelanieN (talk) 01:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.