Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian Camp
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:44, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Russian Camp[edit]
- Russian Camp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There does seem to be a hunting camp with more or less the right name, but the only website I could find for it ([1]) doesn't mention this story, and the only mentions of the tale I could find were a tourism site that could just as well be recycling our content and a compendium of Wikipedia articles. Of course the article lacks citations; it was created by an IP years ago. I don't know that this is a hoax but I don't see enough evidence to believe the story. Mangoe (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 August 29. Snotbot t • c » 18:52, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but Purge With Fire, Rename, and RewriteDelete: The story about the Russians appears to be a hoax, or at the very least hard-failing WP:V. The existiance of "Mallo Camp", however, is easily verified: see this gBooks search which clearly establishes Mallo Camp as a place, independent of the motel. As a geographical location and, it appears, a populated place, this likely falls under the remit of Wikipedia's status as a gazzeteer. It needs to be renamed to Mallo Camp, Wyoming and have all the junk about Russians removed though. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- That sounds to me like a "delete and write some other article" outcome. Mangoe (talk) 10:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I suppose the WP:TNT would be appropriate. - The Bushranger One ping only 15:23, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:39, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. My reading of the SALT I treaty text is that verification was to be made by National technical means of verification, which in those days in the late 1970s meant primarily imagery intelligence. On-site inspections were not contemplated until the INF treaty, years later. SALT II never went into force. Therefore the reference to Russian inspectors is a hoax. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:04, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Buckshot. A solid and reliable source is needed to support something like this. Nick-D (talk) 02:02, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I concur with the above. No facts prove this. Jrcrin001 (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Google searches for a variety of keywords, e.g. (mallo soviet missile inspector) yield no results. Per Buckshot06's argument, this feels rather hoaxsome. In any case: no evidence of notability. Ammodramus (talk) 18:26, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.