Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Hartstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:06, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Hartstein

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PR puff piece about a non-notable animal behaviorist. Lots of interviews and passing mentions but nothing substantial or meaningful. Praxidicae (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:29, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not supposed to be a platform for promotion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lots of passing mention, but no significant biographic information in reliable secondary sources. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete possibly a speedy delete as entirely promotional, complete with the name-dropping of his celebrity clients. DGG ( talk ) 00:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence that he is notable, even though he may work for celebrities.NotButtigieg (talk) 10:07, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This should be G11 case, DGG. scope_creep^Talk 13:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.