Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Bowers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 19:22, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Bowers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a radio broadcaster, edging heavily into promotional/public relations rather than encyclopedic style, and relying only on a single primary source for referencing — and while he's still with the CBC in a different role, he's no longer the host of the program that this article describes him as the host of, with the result that even the one primary source that's been cited here doesn't actually support the claim anymore (and just replacing it with the website of the program he is now hosting would still be a primary source.) It's also worth mentioning that the article's original creator was User:VoiceOfRuss, raising the likelihood of WP:COI editing. As a former host of a provincewide program on CBC Radio, he might certainly qualify for a properly sourced and neutral article, but he's not entitled to keep a PR profile that's referenced only to a primary source that isn't even relevant anymore. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 02:50, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 04:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerlyHMSSolent)}|lambast 04:56, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find any reliable secondary sources to support notability. Tchaliburton (talk) 20:27, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:22, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I can't find anything to suggest that the subject meets either the general notability guideline or the specific guidelines for broadcasters. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 04:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.