Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupesh Talaskar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rupesh Talaskar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiably sourced Bio. PROD contested. Not seeing anything in sources provided that is independent, or verifiable. Seems to fail WP:NOTE. Fbifriday (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, apparently an autobiography, the sources are not enough to meet our notability criteria (WP:GNG, WP:ARTIST) and my online search didn't reveal anything of use. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 09:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - For reasons stated above! NitRav (talk) 09:34, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete,Not a notable person. Page is created for self-promotion and self-publicity (see in Page history). No reliable references are available. Should be deleted urgently. Jussychoulex (talk) 12:51, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Neither in the jumble of primary sources and references which do not mention the subject, nor elsewhere, am I finding anything to demonstrate that the subject meets the notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 18:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.