Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rung Paisarn RPS-001

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vz. 58#Variants. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 10:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rung Paisarn RPS-001[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable firearm; a search in English turned up no reliable sources. Possible that a Thai-speaker could help. Created by User:Ctway sock. ansh 666 07:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 07:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 07:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. ansh 666 07:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines.--RAF910 (talk) 17:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Added a mention of it to Vz. 58#Variants. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vz. 58 § Variants. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.