Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rumble (online video management)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow keep. (non-admin closure) JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 20:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rumble (online video management)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources and I'm not seeing any evidence of satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH. The article was previously nominated for deletion by Störm at Rumble (website). GSS ^💬 03:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep not even including the coverage already cited in the article, I easily found [1][2][3]. I'd consider this substantial coverage per the guideline you linked. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 03:36, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This website is a significant player in the video sharing game, and is growing fast. Whether or not one agrees with its content, it is clearly worthy of having an article.Vgy7ujm (talk) 04:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The sources from Elliot321 clearly establish WP:NCORP beyond any reasonable doubt. Assuming others feel similarly, please snow close this before it stays on the page too long. GSS, I urge you to withdraw the nomination. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 07:40, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.