Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruit van Bonjol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, clear consensus, AFD started by blocked sockpuppet. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:05, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ruit van Bonjol[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trifling bauble of a medal. Rasputin72 (talk) 06:21, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep What? A military decoration issued by a sovereign nation is notable. There are three references. A Dutch speaker could expand this, sure, but what is worthy of deletion? Bradjamesbrown (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk) 08:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article appears to have three good references, and I agree with Bradjamesbrown that "A military decoration issued by a sovereign nation is notable." And even if I thought the article should be deleted, I would avoid terminology such as "trifling bauble of a medal". — Eastmain (talk) 08:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep - this is a bit of a strange nomination. All it needs is translation from the Dutch, and there are good dead-tree sources at the Dutch version. Buckshot06 (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.