Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudy Farias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 01:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rudy Farias[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:ONEEVENT, this young man doesn't seem to me to be a suitable subject of a Wikipedia article. Basically teenager goes missing and is found 8 years later. Slightly unusual event, but with no lasting consequences. Sionk (talk) 23:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The potential ramifications of this case are ongoing. It is also linked to in other wikipedia articles including that of Quannel X to contextualise their current activism. Also it does not seem to be a case of "goes missing and then turns up" as the entire issue is about if he was missing at all, if he was assaulted, what role his mother played in this and any potential responsibility of the Houston PD. While this may not be a hot button case any longer making the waves I think that is an important reason to leave it up. That way any information and updates can be collated and more easily accessed. 110.21.186.111 (talk) 08:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is Quannel X? Oaktree b (talk) 01:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. I see no evidence that the "potential ramifications of this case are ongoing", and I cannot find any substantive coverage in reliable sources outside of local news (viz. WP:AUD) beyond information from around the date of the incident. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:36, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is not an event of sufficient significance. It's a one off event without sustained and significant coverage or impact. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see why he's notable, could perhaps write an article around the disappearance, but that's likely not more notable. Oaktree b (talk) 01:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.