Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudralife
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Rudralife[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rudralife (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NORG. All sources are promoting the subject or its exhibitions. Tagged since 2018. Sells pseudoscientific astrology stuff. Venkat TL (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Venkat TL (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- delete I failed to find any independent non-promotional in-depth coverage. Loew Galitz (talk) 21:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete can’t find anything that shows non-promotional in-depth coverage. Alimovvarsu (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. No indication of notability whatsoever; this is an advert. FalconK (talk) 10:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.