Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruchir Punjabi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 16:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ruchir Punjabi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable former president of the University of Sydney Union. Codf1977 (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Codf1977 (talk) 11:31, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:08, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This appears to be a student politician, and I'm fairly certain that doesn't qualify under GNG. AniMate 14:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Student politicians should be held to the WP:POLITICIAN standard, which they fail. Of absolutely no notability beyond the very narrow world of university politics. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:28, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Mkativerata (talk) 20:48, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - previously deleted as non-notable in 2007 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruchir Punjabi, and I don't see any evidence that he's become significantly more notable since then. Robofish (talk) 23:14, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the main consideration I propose is that this person has contributed significantly to the International students arena in the country and certainly lead the government to various reviews in the sector Da amazerxl (talk) 07:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not fulfill WP:POLITICIAN criteria. Australian Matt (talk) 13:51, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.