Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royston Arts Festival

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Royston Arts Festival[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NEVENT. UtherSRG (talk) 12:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Music, Visual arts, Events, United Kingdom, and England. UtherSRG (talk) 12:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Royston,_Hertfordshire#Popular_culture where it's mentioned. However if consensus evolves that that's not a good ATD, suggest trimming the mention there. Star Mississippi 17:09, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Switching to delete, per the below. Didn't realize it wasn't an existing mention. Star Mississippi 18:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The mention there was added by the original author of this article. Given they probably have a COI, I'd lean towards full removal. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, should have checked that history. Makes sense to remove then as I find no other indication it is large enough to merit a mention. Star Mississippi 18:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:26, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to Royston,_Hertfordshire: The coverage which can be found is local in scope and I agree that it cannot demonstrate sufficient notability for an article, but I do think that the inclusion of the information (supported by sources around Creative Royston and affiliated organisations, as well as the local council [1]) enhances the understanding of the town's cultural activities. The information would be better distinguished in an Amenities section though, rather than "Popular Culture" which tends to be a collection of minor associations. AllyD (talk) 07:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable organization's promotional fluff. We must be cautious before recommending addition of trivial contents into a location page like town/city. Graywalls (talk) 23:47, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.