Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roycemore School
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Nathan Johnson (talk) 17:43, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Roycemore School[edit]
- Roycemore School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Reason IAREALSOTHENIGGEST (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2011 (UTC) Very biased, written like an advertisement, and no sources cited.[reply]
- Userfy (if someone wants it) 90% of the article reads like their website. Just info info for prospective students/customers and marketing info. That needs to get deleted. And it needs references added. Has zero references, zero indication of wp: notability, but I'm guessing that it has the possibility of being able to establish notability. Being several years old and having the above problems means that the status quo isn't working. North8000 (talk) 17:29, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per established consensus that secondary schools are presumed notable. Shortcomings in the current version of the article should be addressed through normal editing rather than deletion of an article on a notable topic. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 18:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep The nominator has been blocked indefinitely for violating the Wikipedia username policy. This very expensive private school, established 1915, includes a high school, which makes it notable per the defacto notability standard observable in the outcomes of countless AFDs in recent years. Editing is the solution to any problems noted in the article. Google Book search is your friend: Here is a 1917 reference from The Western Architect with extensive coverage of the school and particularly its building:[1].The Chicago Sun Times in 1999 called the building "a big stucco-clad craftsman treasure.." Chicago magazine in 2007 looked at 56 private high schools in the Chicago area and said Roycemore had the lowest student faculty ratio at 9.7, with a tuition of $18,425 per year, not quite the highest.. Basic info about he school is in the handbooks of private schools in the US, which have had coverage of this school from 1918 to the present time. Edison (talk) 19:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep: The AfD notice does not appear on the article. AFD is not for cleanup. And in addition to Edison's well-taken points, the original school building is on the U.S. national register of historic places. This AfD is pure trolling from a douchenozzle.--Milowent • talkblp-r 17:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable school and clean up outwtih this AfD. TerriersFan (talk) 22:07, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep disruptive nomination. No prejudice to a good faith renomination. ThemFromSpace 15:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.