Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Roads University Student Association
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Royal Roads University. Cirt (talk) 09:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Royal Roads University Student Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This organisation shows no particular evidence of notability; 27 non-Wikipedia Google hits. Deprodded by a spa. Abductive (talk) 20:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the article does not assert notability, and a web search does not turn up any third-party coverage—largely just internal links and listings on social networking sites. Maralia (talk) 02:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Royal Roads University, possible search term StarM 04:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 27 Google hits does not suggest people are searching for this outside of the University. Let them
eat cakeuse Facebook. Abductive (talk) 04:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- 27 Google hits does not suggest people are searching for this outside of the University. Let them
- Merge/redirect to Royal Roads University. At present the relevant section in the main article is empty so incorporating the key facts from this page is the way to go. TerriersFan (talk) 17:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 17:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to RRU. Unsourced, so no point merging. Chzz ► 18:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'd say merge or redirect but there doesn't seem to be a practical point to doing either. DreamGuy (talk) 15:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.