Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Silk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 00:12, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Silk

This article is a hoax. Robert Kilroy-Silk's father (William Silk) was a Royal Navy stoker who died in 1943. There are no Carry On films called Carry On Dad or Carry On Please (source). --Muchness 16:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nom. --Muchness 16:42, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Punkmorten 16:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Bhoeble 16:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Save As a huge fan of the Carry On series, I recall Silk's role's in Please and Dad with fond memories. Please don't consign this small token to his memory to deletion. Baron von Economo 17:48, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This is Baron von Economo's first edit. --King of All the Franks 18:07, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the above user also created "Dog Standard" and "Yes, cheese", both speedied nonsense. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:32, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as complete nonsense. Jcuk 18:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --NaconKantari 21:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot believe this. I absolutely cannot believe this. I was handed all of this information in good faith by a person who swore, despite my intutions, that it was true and verifiable. I really cannot believe this. In the future I won't be so hasty in putting articles on Wikipedia whose verity I have doubts about. My contact will, I assure you, never be trusted by me again. Barbara Osgood 13:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:32, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If it's a hoax by a strongly suspected sockpuppet it can surely be speedy deleted?! If that's what it is it also counts as vandalism. Zap it! --kingboyk 18:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I am not a sockpuppet. I am not Fontaine. Can you not check by IP's or something? I'm naive in matters of technology. Barbara Osgood 22:33, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.