Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Nachum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.Ty 00:26, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Nachum[edit]

I nominated this article for speedy deletion but the tag was removed. The subject appears to be an aspiring NY artist. There is nothing notable about being an aspiring NY artist. According to the uncited sentence in the article, some celebrities and a few random people who don't have wikipedia pages have bought his art. The links supposedly establishing his notability don't really indicate he's a big deal. One of them does note that he his agent is making an effort to raise the artist’s profile. Ordinarily, as an inclusionist, I couldn't care less. I know plenty of artists in the city who would like to raise their profiles. I'm related to artists in the city who want to raise their profiles. I used to BE an artist in the city trying to raise his profile. I sympathise. But not enough to say with a straight face that this guy is notable without seeing more.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 04:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete although he has mention in a variety of places it seems to always be in connection with the restuarant or his one painting in the gallery. I'm unsure if we have specific things on "creative designers" and "artists" but, if we don't this one does seem to fail WP:N and WP:V
Weak delete. Although I agree it is not a speedy candidate, I'm not seeing enough of an assertion of notability to convince me to keep this one. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 20:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He seems to have achieved some degree of notoriety. A Moti Hasson Gallery exhibition is fairly important. Neutrality^talk 03:43, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nice beginnings, but not encyclopedia material....yet. Modernist (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He's beginning his career and there's some interest in his work, but he's not notable yet. There are no major exhibitions yet, no critical writing and no real evidence of being in any collections of note.freshacconci speaktome 14:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.