Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Geronemus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:20, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Geronemus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:PROMO for a ~~run-of-the-mill~~ dermatologist. Doctors are very often affiliated with hospitals, and very often publish in scientific journals. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Struck "run-of-the-mill" as misleading per the below. Misreading of the evidence on my part. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:07, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 04:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's always harder to judge with doctors, particularly with anything to do with dermatology, laser surgery, etc. But this doctor certainly does not appear to be "run-of-the-mill". GoogleScholar gives him the h-index of 76, which is astonomically high, for any discipline. Although in medicine many "best doctor in ..." type listings are not worth much as honors, he has a number of individual society awards (I added a couple to the article) of the type that WP:PROF has in mind. Also he was president of two scolarly/medical societies which could perhaps count as passing WP:PROF#C6. In any case, one can't fake an h-index of 76. So I'll say that passes WP:PROF#C1. Nsk92 (talk) 12:04, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PROF#C1 and maybe #C6 as above. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.