Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Bradshaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No Consensus to delete. Eluchil404 22:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Bradshaw[edit]

Not sufficiently notable Lrjlo (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. --Evb-wiki (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ≈Alessandro ♫^{T • C} 19:30, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Uncertain associate professor of geography at the University of Nottingham, with two books. Have not yet checked to see if more can be found, DGG (talk) 06:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Bradshaw is very significant academic in his field, and more sources should be available. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - nom makes an empty claim with no evidence whatsoever. Unless Jrjlo is from the academic field, I'll consider this a bad faith nom. --.Tom. (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.