Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roxbury Mall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The argument that the sources are about an isolated crime rather than being about the subject of the article is convincing and largely unrefuted.--Kubigula (talk) 03:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Roxbury Mall

Non-notable strip mall in New Jersey. Granted, the sources are reliable third-party sources, but three of the four sources are about a robbery at a Funcoland store there, and Wikipedia is not the news. Beyond that, it's just an ordinary strip mall with nothing notable about it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a very large regional mall with reliable and verifiable sources provided. Alansohn (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But as I said, three of those four sources aren't about the mall, so much as they are about a robbery at a store there. Robberies (sadly) happen all the time, and they don't make this mall any more notable than millions of other strips across the world. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 17:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The size, scope, nature and characteristics, combined with reliable and verifiable sources do establish notability. I've read your nomination, and I heartily disagree with it (and most of the rest of your deletion crusade). Repeating your statement does nothing to change my opinion of notability. Alansohn (talk) 17:59, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This mall isn't notable; it's just another strip mall. -- Mikeblas (talk) 18:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sign of notability. The only source not about the robbery is just a listing in a directory of malls. DCEdwards1966 (talk) 20:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. RMHED (talk) 22:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable power centre which is supported by multiple reliable sources. While some of them are cursory, as a whole they support the verifiability of the subject. RFerreira 07:37, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lack of reliable sources about the mall, rather than events happening at it. Cumulus Clouds 18:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.