Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowan of the Bukshah (character)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rowan of Rin (series). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 10:41, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rowan of the Bukshah (character)[edit]

Rowan of the Bukshah (character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fictional character that has been tagged for over 6 years now. Not much info, I think it can be redirected to the novels. Wgolf (talk) 22:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:09, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rowan of Rin. Nothing to suggest he is notable enough for an independent article. Boleyn (talk) 07:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 23:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rediret to Rowan of Rin. Not notable enough for a standalone article. Wikicology (talk) 14:44, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Not enough to say in a standalone article. Dcfc1988 (talk) 22:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.