Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rover 45 v6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rover 45 v6

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No need for this new article, already dealt with by the existing Rover 45 article Warren (talk) 09:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 11:24, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It all just seems like Original Research to me, Nothing much to merge and a pointless redirect. –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is not needed and content covered elsewhere. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (parlez) @ 20:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.