Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Routemaster Rampage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Routemaster Rampage

Notability not asserted in article, only self-published references and links. Creator with obvious WP:COI. --Latebird (talk) 02:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It looks like it might also be a hoax. I find it hard to believe that one of these buses could make it to Cape Town from London. And how about the expense? It would be better to give the money directly to charity than have the rally. Borock (talk) 05:59, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not directly hoax, probably intent to have the rally and use wikipedia to get more web hits, but will probably never happen. Delete as per WP:CRYSTAL since no WP:RS. Also page created by Grifco (talk · contribs) who have only contributed to this page and Go help which sponsors this event, so WP:COI as stated in nom. --Stefan ^talk 07:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question: how come that the author had indeed conflict of interest? I would like to remain neutral until this question is answered. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 11:02, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the youtube video linked from the article, then you'll see the same name appear in the intro. It's obvious that this is a SPA created solely to promote Go help and related projects. --Latebird (talk) 01:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete COI or not, the article seems promotional, I cannot locate any verifiable, third party sources, no evidence of notability, etc. Dloh cierekim 22:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no evidence of notability from WP:RS, appears to be part of a WP:COATRACK with the Go help article. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's the word. Dloh cierekim 02:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.