Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rothesay Park School
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 01:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Rothesay Park School[edit]
- Rothesay Park School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
not notable; no useful information in the article. Enigma (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. No useful information except 3rd party acknowledgments for excellence, now partially cited and verified. The article's boastful tone needs to be fixed, but its an okay stub otherwise. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If you're volunteering to improve the article, keep by all means, ;) but as it is, it's trash and no one has put any real work into it at all. Enigma (talk) 00:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep looks a valid stub. Sting au Buzz Me... 02:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Enigma (talk) 03:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Good start to an article. Profiled in Today's Parent magazine as a Top 40 school in Canada. DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This is a 19th century school that has undergone name changes - plenty of history here that can be added. TerriersFan (talk) 05:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep per DoubleBlue and Terriers. JoshuaZ (talk) 05:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per DoubleBlue and Terriers - seems like the good beginnings to an article.BWH76 (talk) 11:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep per DoubleBlue and Terriers -- even though it's got the worst infobox I have ever laid eyes on. I will have nightmares for weeks. The "History" section shows some important local notability. Noroton (talk) 21:30, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per TerriersFan, this is a perfectly valid topic for inclusion. RFerreira (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.