Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosz Craig
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Rosz Craig[edit]
- Rosz Craig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable artist. Google search turns up links to the person in their capacity as an employee involved in various activities, but not to them as an artist. One reference is not clearly a reliable source; the other web source is a dead link. hamiltonstone (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. UltraMagnusspeak 10:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 00:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I'd expect that a current artist with such an unusual name would turn up something on Google, but nothing. Sources don't really indicate notability, I don't think she meets the bar. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.